Hoover WDXA496A2 vs Samsung WD90J6410AX

Hoover WDXA496A2
Samsung WD90J6410AX

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

10 Reasons For
11dB lower noise level (drying) Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 51dB drying noise level washer dryer, whereas the Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 62dB drying noise level washer dryer (11dB higher).
One more quantity of washing programs Edit
The number of quantity of washing programss on the Hoover WDXA496A2 is three, but the Samsung WD90J6410AX only has two quantity of washing programss.
Significantly shorter cycle time washing & drying Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 59 min washing & drying cycle time washer dryer, whereas the Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 592 min washing & drying cycle time washer dryer (533 min longer).
Significantly shorter cycle time washing Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a cycle time washing of 130 min, however the Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 200 min washing cycle time washer dryer (70 min longer).
254kWh lower annual energy consumption washing & drying Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has an annual energy consumption washing & drying of 970kWh, however the Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 1,224kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer (254kWh higher).
1,000L lower annual water consumption washing Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 9,800L annual water consumption when washing washer dryer, whereas the Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 10,800L annual water consumption when washing washer dryer (1,000L higher).
A little lower annual energy consumption washing Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is 228kWh annual energy consumption when washing, but the Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 234kWh annual energy consumption when washing washer dryer (6kWh higher).
Lower energy consumption washing per cycle Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is 1.14kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing. That's 0.03kWh lower than the Samsung WD90J6410AX (1.17kWh).
Cheaper to run by £442.32
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is £442.32 cheaper to run than the Samsung WD90J6410AX over five years. Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Hoover WDXA496A2 is "A", whereas the rating of the Samsung WD90J6410AX is "A".
5 Reasons For
Slightly lower noise level (spin) Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 73dB spin noise level washer dryer, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 78dB spin noise level washer dryer (5dB higher).
Lower noise level (wash) Edit
Samsung WD90J6410AX is 54dB wash noise level. That's 7dB lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (54dB).
6,200L lower annual water consumption washing & drying Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 19,800L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 26,000L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer (6,200L higher).
Better manufacturer's guarantee by four years
The Samsung WD90J6410AX comes with a five year guarantee from the manufacturer, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 has a one year guarantee.
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Samsung WD90J6410AX has an energy efficiency rating of "A", whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 has a rating of "A".

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
7% higher noise level (spin) Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 78dB spin noise level washer dryer. That's 5dB higher than the Samsung WD90J6410AX (73dB).
Higher noise level (wash) Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is 61dB wash noise level, but the Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 54dB wash noise level washer dryer (7dB lower).
6,200L higher annual water consumption washing & drying Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 26,000L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer. That's 6,200L higher than the Samsung WD90J6410AX (19,800L).
Four months years shorter manufacturer's guarantee
The Hoover WDXA496A2 comes with a manufacturer's guarantee of one year, whereas the Samsung WD90J6410AX has a one year guarantee.
9 Reasons Against
11dB higher noise level (drying) Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 62dB drying noise level washer dryer. That's 11dB higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (62dB).
Only two quantity of washing programss Edit
The number of quantity of washing programss on the Samsung WD90J6410AX is two, but the Hoover WDXA496A2 only has three quantity of washing programss.
91% longer cycle time washing & drying Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 592 min washing & drying cycle time washer dryer. That's 533 min longer than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (592 min).
Longer cycle time washing Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AX has a cycle time washing of 200 min. That's 70 min longer than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (200 min).
21% higher annual energy consumption washing & drying Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AX has an annual energy consumption washing & drying of 1,224kWh. That's 254kWh higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (1,224kWh).
10% higher annual water consumption washing Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AX is a 10,800L annual water consumption when washing washer dryer. That's 1,000L higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (10,800L).
Higher annual energy consumption washing Edit
Samsung WD90J6410AX is 234kWh annual energy consumption when washing. That's 6kWh higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (234kWh).
0.03kWh higher energy consumption washing per cycle Edit
Samsung WD90J6410AX is 1.17kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing, but the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 1.14kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer (0.03kWh lower).
£442.32 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the running costs of the Samsung WD90J6410AX are £4,821.90 which is £442.32 more than the Hoover WDXA496A2. Show assumptions.

Date Released

36 months Ago 36 months Ago

Manufacturer's Warranty

1 Year 5 Years

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 2,971.47
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ 1,408.11
Total running cost £ 4,379.58
Electricity cost - switched on £ 3,749.57
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ 1,072.33
Total running cost £ 4,821.90

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

15T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 15 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
378
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1,501 baths
Running this washer dryer over over 10 years will use 405,000 litres of water. That's the same as having 1,501 baths.
19T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
477
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1,143 baths
Running this washer dryer over over 10 years will use 309,000 litres of water. That's the same as having 1,143 baths.

Performance

Washing Capacity
9kg 9kg
Drying Capacity
6kg 6kg
Load Balancing System
 Load balancing system
 Load balancing system
Noise Level (drying)
51dB
BEST
62dB
Noise Level (spin)
78dB 73dB
BEST
Noise Level (wash)
61dB 54dB
BEST
Adjustable Spin Speed
 Adjustable spin speed
 Adjustable spin speed
Delayed Start Timer
 Delayed start timer
 Delayed start timer
Drying Program
 Cotton
 Synthetic
 Cotton
 Synthetic
Washing Program
 Cold
 Cold
Quantity of Washing Programs
3
BEST
2
Maximum Spin Speed
1,400 RPM 1,400 RPM
Cycle Time Washing & Drying
59 min
BEST
592 min
Cycle Time Washing
130 min
BEST
200 min

Other Features

Spin-Drying Class
 A
 A

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A
 A
Energy Consumption Washing & Drying Per Cycle
4.85kWh
BEST
6.12kWh
Water Consumption Washing & Drying Per Cycle
130L 99L
BEST
Water Consumption Washing Per Cycle
49L
BEST
54L
Annual Water Consumption Washing & Drying
26,000L 19,800L
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption Washing & Drying
970kWh
BEST
1,224kWh
Annual Water Consumption Washing
9,800L
BEST
10,800L
Annual Energy Consumption Washing
228kWh
BEST
234kWh
Energy Consumption Washing Per Cycle
1.14kWh
BEST
1.17kWh

Ergonomics

Remaining Time Indication
 Remaining time indication
 Remaining time indication
Sensor Program Selection
 Sensor program selection
 Sensor program selection

Design

Loading Type
 Front-load
 Front-load
Colour of Product
 White
 White
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Control Type
 Rotary
 Rotary
Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Reversible Doors
 Reversible doors
 Reversible doors

Weight & Dimensions

Height
850mm 850mm
Width
600mm 600mm
Weight
73kg 70kg
BEST
Depth
540mm 650mm
Package Height
890mm 890mm
Package Depth
600mm
BEST
747mm
Package Width
650mm
BEST
666mm
Feedback